From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: HYBRID: PV in HVM container
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:27:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4C160D.2000206@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312880045.26263.28.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On 08/09/2011 01:54 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Also there are arguments to be made for HYBRID over PVHVM in terms of
> ease of manageability (i.e. a lot of folks like the dom0-supplied kernel
> idiom which PV enables), avoiding the need for a virtualised BIOS and
> emulated boot paths, HYBRID can potentially give a best of both in the
> trade off between standard-PV vs. HVM/PVHVM while also not needing a
> QEMU process for each guest (which helps scalability and so on) etc. I
> think HYBRID is worthwhile even if it is basically on-par with PVHVM for
> some workloads.
And it's amazing how much stuff goes away when you can set CONFIG_PCI=n...
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-17 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-27 19:24 HYBRID: PV in HVM container Mukesh Rathor
2011-06-27 19:36 ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-28 1:51 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-06-28 7:46 ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-28 8:30 ` Ian Campbell
2011-06-28 8:35 ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-28 8:49 ` Ian Campbell
2011-06-28 10:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-06-28 10:50 ` Ian Campbell
2011-06-28 18:32 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-06-28 18:39 ` Keir Fraser
2011-06-28 8:31 ` Ian Campbell
2011-06-28 17:56 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-07-01 1:54 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-07-09 1:53 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-07-09 7:35 ` Keir Fraser
2011-07-28 1:58 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-07-28 11:34 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-29 15:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-29 16:41 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-29 17:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-29 18:00 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-07-29 18:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-07-29 18:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-08-09 8:54 ` Ian Campbell
2011-08-17 19:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2011-07-29 15:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-17 23:38 ` Mukesh Rathor
2011-11-18 12:21 ` Stefano Stabellini
2011-11-19 0:17 ` Mukesh Rathor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E4C160D.2000206@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.