From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wanlong Gao Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Input: elantech - add v3 hardware support Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:44:20 +0800 Message-ID: <4E4CA6B4.5060807@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1313632629-23603-1-git-send-email-jj_ding@emc.com.tw> <1313632629-23603-7-git-send-email-jj_ding@emc.com.tw> <4E4C80A0.8090708@cn.fujitsu.com> <87d3g347ey.fsf@emc.com.tw> <4E4CA3A9.2010900@cn.fujitsu.com> Reply-To: gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:64557 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752565Ab1HRFp0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:45:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Kurtz Cc: JJ Ding , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Seth Forshee , Dmitry Torokhov , Aaron Huang , Tom Lin , Eric Piel , Chase Douglas , Henrik Rydberg , Alessandro Rubini On 08/18/2011 01:34 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote: >> On 08/18/2011 01:26 PM, JJ Ding wrote: >>> >>> Hi Wanlong Gao, >>> >>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:01:52 +0800, Wanlong Gao >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 08/18/2011 09:57 AM, JJ Ding wrote: >>>>> >>>>> v3 hardware's packet format is almost identical to v2 (one/three finger >>>>> touch), >>>>> except when sensing two finger touch, the hardware sends 12 bytes of >>>>> data. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: JJ Ding >>>>> --- >>>>> Documentation/input/elantech.txt | 104 ++++++++++++++++-- >>>>> drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c | 218 >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >>>>> drivers/input/mouse/elantech.h | 11 ++ >>>>> 3 files changed, 303 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> +static int determine_packet_v3(struct psmouse *psmouse) >>>> >>>> elantech_check_parity_v1 >>>> packet_simple_check_v2 >>>> determine_packet_v3 >>>> >>>> Why not consistent them? >>> >>> OK, how do these names sound to you? >>> >>> elantech_check_parity_v1 >>> elantech_packet_check_v2 >>> elantech_packet_check_v3 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> jj >> >> Yeah, sounds perfectly. > > Or just: > > elantech_packet_check_v1 > elantech_packet_check_v2 > elantech_packet_check_v3 > > :) Hmm... maybe they can go into an elantech_packet_check()? like: case 1: ... case 2: ... What do you think? ;) Thanks -Wanlong Gao > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >