From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QuKo7-0005nc-HG for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:52:03 +0000 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1QuKo6-0005PI-3x for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:52:03 +0000 Message-ID: <4E4E2427.9080602@nod.at> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:51:51 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E4D642F.3010909@nod.at> <20110818191946.GW2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20110819043120.GY2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110819043120.GY2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Subject: [PATCH 00/91] pending uml patches To: Al Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Am 19.08.2011 06:31, schrieb Al Viro: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 08:19:46PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:12:47PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Have you touched your patches since yesterday? >>> I've already pulled and uploaded them to my shiny new git repo at: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/linux-um.git unstable >> >> Reordered and added missing S-o-b on a couple, split one commit. > > Umm... One comment after looking at your tree: you probably want to rebase > for-3.2 on top of fixes (and presumably feed it to sfr for inclusion into > linux-next). Please slow down a bit. :-) All these branches are just for testing purposes. That's why I have not announced them nor sent a pull request to Linus. Anyway, thanks for the hints! Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2 _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752123Ab1HSIv7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 04:51:59 -0400 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:57255 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751513Ab1HSIv6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 04:51:58 -0400 Message-ID: <4E4E2427.9080602@nod.at> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:51:51 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Al Viro CC: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH 00/91] pending uml patches References: <4E4D642F.3010909@nod.at> <20110818191946.GW2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20110819043120.GY2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110819043120.GY2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 19.08.2011 06:31, schrieb Al Viro: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 08:19:46PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:12:47PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> Have you touched your patches since yesterday? >>> I've already pulled and uploaded them to my shiny new git repo at: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/linux-um.git unstable >> >> Reordered and added missing S-o-b on a couple, split one commit. > > Umm... One comment after looking at your tree: you probably want to rebase > for-3.2 on top of fixes (and presumably feed it to sfr for inclusion into > linux-next). Please slow down a bit. :-) All these branches are just for testing purposes. That's why I have not announced them nor sent a pull request to Linus. Anyway, thanks for the hints! Thanks, //richard