Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: capfun: AD7150: Add support for the second interrupt strobe.

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>]

On 08/19/11 14:48, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 08/19/11 14:38, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 08/19/11 13:41, michael.hennerich@analog.com wrote:
>>> From: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
>>>
>>> The AD7150 features two outputs that can be used as interrupt strobes
>>> to the host processor. In order to receive all events independently,
>>> both need to utilized.
>>>
>>> Update copyright notice.
>>
>> Looks sane. I'll pull it into capfun for now.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
>> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7150.c |   33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>  1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7150.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7150.c
>>> index 4bc5b20..711e8b1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7150.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7150.c
>>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>>>  /*
>>>   * AD7150 capacitive sensor driver supporting AD7150/1/6
>>>   *
>>> - * Copyright 2010 Analog Devices Inc.
>>> + * Copyright 2010-2011 Analog Devices Inc.
>>>   *
>>>   * Licensed under the GPL-2 or later.
>>>   */
>>> @@ -45,14 +45,6 @@
>>>  #define AD7150_SN0                 22
>>>  #define AD7150_ID                  23
>>>  
>>> -#define AD7150_MAX_CONV_MODE       4
>>> -
>>> -/**
>>> - * Todo list:
>>> - * - Review whether old_state usage makes sense.
>>> - * - get rid of explicit control of conversion mode
>>> - */
>>> -
>>>  /**
>>>   * struct ad7150_chip_info - instance specific chip data
>>>   * @client: i2c client for this device
>>> @@ -596,17 +588,30 @@ static int __devinit ad7150_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>>  					   &ad7150_event_handler,
>>>  					   IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING |
>>>  					   IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
>>> -					   "ad7150",
>>> +					   "ad7150_irq1",
>>>  					   indio_dev);
>>>  		if (ret)
>>>  			goto error_free_dev;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> +	if (client->dev.platform_data) {
>>> +		ret = request_threaded_irq(client->dev.platform_data,
> Small query here - should this be
> *client->dev.platform_data? (that's the fixup I've just merged)
Doh. Of course that is a void derefernce.

What I mean is

*(unsigned int *)client->dev.platform_data.