Re: [beagleboard] Unable to build Angstrom meta-toolchain

From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Unable to build Angstrom meta-toolchain
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 07:32:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4E7416.1070105@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E4E62AB.1050603@balister.org>

On 8/19/2011 6:18 AM, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 08/19/2011 02:33 AM, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
>> Am 18.08.2011 19:48, schrieb Peter Housel:
>>> On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 15:10 +0200, fabian büttner wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am having troubles compiling the Angstrom SDK.
>>>>
>>>> I used the angstrom-setup-scripts to configure OE, sourced the
>>>> environment settings and built the base-image/console-image with
>>>> bitbake.
>>>>
>>>> While trying to compile the meta-toolchain, just when bitmake finishes
>>>> downloading task-sdk-bare_1.0-r2.6_armv7a.ipk, I am getting an error
>>>> output like this:
>>>>
>>>> http://pastie.org/2390409
>>>>
>>>> After that, I tried building the meta-toolchain(i did a bitmake clean
>>>> meta-toolchain) without '-j2' but the error I receive is ultimately
>>>> the same:
>>>> * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies
>>>> * for task-sdk-bare:
>>>> * libstdc++-dev *
>>>> * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package task-sdk-bare.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately I am too unexperienced with OE/Angstrom to fix bugs
>>>> like that.
>>>> Maybe someone could give me a hint how to get around this show-stopper?
>>> I can confirm that I've been seeing this as well on recent
>>> 2011.03-maintenance, but haven't had a chance to troubleshoot the root
>>> cause yet.
>>>
>> It was inbtroduced with commit 105d881227d06f31c180dffb777ee63361b2f2b8
>> "gcc: Package libstdc++ gdb python helpers into dev package".
>> If no helpers exist the empty package will not be generated.
>> I have try to add
>> ALLOW_EMPTY_libstdc++-dev = "1"
>> to gcc-package-cross.inc but this breaks meta-toolchain as the files in
>> ${prefix}/${TARGET_SYS}/usr/include/c++ are missing.
>>
>> Only removing libstdc++-dev package from gcc-package-cross.inc fix the
>> problem.
>
> Does anyone know if dv has the same problem? I can't check easily at the
> moment.

what happens if you remove  libstdc++-dev libgcc-dev from PACKAGES in 
recipes/gcc/gcc-package-cross.inc ?
I will see if I can reproduce it here
>
> Philip
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel