From: Jason Kwon <jason.kwon@ericsson.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
"linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Problems booting 3.0.3 kernel on Octeon CN58XX board
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:14:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4E99F8.4050704@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313773248.3235.87.camel@groeck-laptop>
On 08/19/2011 10:00 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 12:32 -0400, David Daney wrote:
>> On 08/18/2011 05:10 PM, Jason Kwon wrote:
>>> Attempting to boot a 3.0.3 kernel on a CN58XX board produced the
>>> following oops:
>>>
>>> CPU 4 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
>>> 0000000001c00000, epc == ffffffff811aa9f4, ra == ffffffff811aaa98
>>> Oops[#1]:
>>> Cpu 4
>>> $ 0 : 0000000000000000 0000000010008ce0 ffffffff821d2b80 0000000001c00000
>>> $ 4 : 0000000001c00038 000000000000017c 0000000000080000 0000000000080072
>>> $ 8 : 0000000000000008 0000000000000002 0000000000000003 a800000002284520
>>> $12 : 0000000000000002 ffffffff8186ee80 ffffffffffffff80 0000000000000030
>>> $16 : 0000000000080072 0000000000000001 0000000001bfa8f0 0000000001bfa928
>>> $20 : a800000003aff8f0 00000000000f0000 ffffffff8186ee80 ffffffff821d2a80
>>> $24 : 0000000000000001 0000000000000038
>>> $28 : a80000041fc48000 a80000041fc4bd90 fffffffffffffffc ffffffff811aaa98
>>> Hi : 0000000000000000
>>> Lo : 0000000000000000
>>> epc : ffffffff811aa9f4 setup_per_zone_wmarks+0x19c/0x2d8
>>> Not tainted
>>> ra : ffffffff811aaa98 setup_per_zone_wmarks+0x240/0x2d8
>>> Status: 10008ce2 KX SX UX KERNEL EXL
>>> Cause : 40808408
>>> BadVA : 0000000001c00000
>>> PrId : 000d0301 (Cavium Octeon+)
>>> Modules linked in:
>>> Process swapper (pid: 1, threadinfo=a80000041fc48000,
>>> task=a80000041fc44038, tls=0000000000000000)
>>> Stack : 0000000000000000 000000000006f75d ffffffff8186eec0 0000000000000001
>>> 0000000000000547 ffffffff81825598 ffffffff81a80000 ffffffff818b3e68
>>> ffffffff818a40ac 0000000000000000 ffffffff81a80000 0000000000000000
>>> 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff818a40f0
>>> ffffffff81a80000 ffffffff81100438 ffffffff818b4198 ffffffff818b3e68
>>> ffffffff818b46c8 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff818721d0
>>> 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff81109bb0
>>> 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>>> 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff818720f8
>>> 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
>>> ...
>>> Call Trace:
>>> [<ffffffff811aa9f4>] setup_per_zone_wmarks+0x19c/0x2d8
>>> [<ffffffff818a40f0>] init_per_zone_wmark_min+0x44/0xe0
>>> [<ffffffff81100438>] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x160
>>> [<ffffffff818721d0>] kernel_init+0xd8/0x178
>>> [<ffffffff81109bb0>] kernel_thread_helper+0x10/0x18
>>>
>> It appears to be related to use of physical memory above the 16GB
>> barrier. You could try reducing the amount of memory allocated to the
>> kernel by passing 'mem=1700M' on the kernel command line.
>>
> Hi David,
>
> are you sure ?
>
> This is what I see with our own boards (not the reference design board):
>
> Works:
>
> Linux version 3.0.3-423-gfa07d39 (groeck@rbos-pc-13) (gcc version 4.4.1
> (Debian 4.4.1-1) ) #2 SMP PREEMPT Thu Aug 18 14:09:53 PDT 2011
> [ ... ]
> CPU revision is: 000d030b (Cavium Octeon+)
> Checking for the multiply/shift bug... no.
> Checking for the daddiu bug... no.
> Determined physical RAM map:
> memory: 00000000001fa000 @ 000000000160b000 (usable)
> memory: 000000000e400000 @ 0000000001900000 (usable)
> memory: 00000000d0000000 @ 0000000020000000 (usable)
> memory: 000000000ffff000 @ 00000000f0001000 (usable)
> memory: 0000000010000000 @ 0000000410000000 (usable)
>
> Crashes:
>
> Linux version 3.0.3-423-gfa07d39 (groeck@rbos-pc-13) (gcc version 4.4.1
> (Debian 4.4.1-1) ) #2 SMP PREEMPT Thu Aug 18 14:09:53 PDT 2011
> [ ... ]
> CPU revision is: 000d0003 (Cavium Octeon)
> Checking for the multiply/shift bug... no.
> Checking for the daddiu bug... no.
> Determined physical RAM map:
> memory: 00000000001fa000 @ 000000000160b000 (usable)
> memory: 000000000e400000 @ 0000000001900000 (usable)
> memory: 0000000060000000 @ 0000000020000000 (usable)
> memory: 0000000010000000 @ 0000000410000000 (usable)
>
> The memory at 0000000410000000 is there for both CPUs, yet the crash is
> only seen on the board with CN38xx. From a SW perspective, only
> difference besides the CPU type is that the working board has more
> memory.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
>
Well, I can confirm that setting mem=1700m on my CN5860 board allowed it
to boot, at least:
Linux version 3.0.3-Cavium-Octeon+ (jkwon@xc5-pc2) (gcc version 4.3.3
(Cavium Networks Version: 2_0_0 build 95) ) #2 SMP Thu Aug 18 15:16:58
PDT 2011
[ ... ]
CPU revision is: 000d0301 (Cavium Octeon+)
Checking for the multiply/shift bug... no.
Checking for the daddiu bug... no.
Determined physical RAM map:
memory: 0000000000208000 @ 0000000001872000 (usable)
memory: 000000000dc00000 @ 0000000002200000 (usable)
memory: 000000005c800000 @ 0000000020000000 (usable)
I also tried the memory restriction on a CN3860 board that was also
hitting the same oops, and it then hit a different problem, so the
restriction did seem to work on both boards.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-19 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-19 0:10 Problems booting 3.0.3 kernel on Octeon CN58XX board Jason Kwon
2011-08-19 0:10 ` Jason Kwon
2011-08-19 1:05 ` David Daney
2011-08-19 10:59 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-08-19 16:32 ` David Daney
2011-08-19 17:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-08-19 17:10 ` David Daney
2011-08-19 17:14 ` Jason Kwon [this message]
2011-08-19 17:35 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E4E99F8.4050704@ericsson.com \
--to=jason.kwon@ericsson.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.