From: John Robinson <john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk>
To: maurice <mhilarius@gmail.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Device utilization with RAID-1
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 04:13:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4F263F.7080405@anonymous.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E4EAC45.9040705@gmail.com>
On 19/08/2011 19:32, maurice wrote:
> On 8/18/2011 6:31 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>> ..
>> In mdstat you have 'active' or 'inactive'. You cannot access an array
>> at all
>> until it is active. If you are assembling an array bit by bit with "mdadm
>> -I", it will be inactive until all the devices appear. Then it will be
>> active.
>>
>> In mdadm "State :" you have 'active' or 'clean'. as described above.
>> It used
>> to be 'dirty' or 'clean' but people were confused by having 'dirty'
>> arrays in
>> normal operation. So I changed it to 'active' and now it confuses a
>> different set of people. You just can't win can you :-)
>>
>> NeilBrown
>
> mdstat:
> "Enabled" or "Disabled" perhaps?
>
> That matches what most commercial hardware RAID interfaces use.
Does it? It sounds more like an administrative action than a current
status. I would have thought "online" or "offline" - unless that means
something else somewhere else.
And for mdadm state: how about "busy" and "idle"? Hmm maybe just "busy"
instead of "active" or "dirty"; we don't want to start an array with
--assume-idle...
Cheers,
John.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-20 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-18 0:26 Fwd: Re: Device utilization with RAID-1 Harald Nikolisin
2011-08-18 1:42 ` NeilBrown
2011-08-18 6:44 ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner
2011-08-18 13:44 ` CoolCold
2011-08-19 0:31 ` NeilBrown
2011-08-19 18:32 ` maurice
2011-08-20 3:13 ` John Robinson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-16 0:39 Harald Nikolisin
2011-08-16 1:30 ` Roberto Spadim
[not found] ` <CABYL=TqYhDSFTx9Bq6_AWZaYd+qtbd=tJyTHJUjXwYHH_qkQnQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-08-16 17:25 ` Harald Nikolisin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E4F263F.7080405@anonymous.org.uk \
--to=john.robinson@anonymous.org.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhilarius@gmail.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.