From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stanislav Kinsbursky Subject: Re: NFS client virtualization plan Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:30:09 +0400 Message-ID: <4E529221.6010102@parallels.com> References: <4E4A4DB1.2090105@parallels.com> <67028AE2-C41D-4D9E-9AB9-81433AD196A2@oracle.com> <4E4E30E8.2080704@parallels.com> <4E4E9B8C.8050000@parallels.com> <20110819193259.GC1641@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: Chuck Lever , Pavel Emelianov , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.232.25]:15456 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752496Ab1HVRab (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:30:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110819193259.GC1641@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 19.08.2011 23:32, J. Bruce Fields =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:21:16PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: >> Actually, yes, I do. Thanks for notice. >> Kernel NSM monitor routines will be virtualized. >> For idmapd and gssd rpc_pipefs virtualization is required. >> I wasn't going to virtualize rpc_pipefs for now - it was planned to = be a part of NFS server virtualization, which is planned to be done aft= er NFS client virtualization. > > You'll need rpc_pipefs for gssd and the old idmapd. > > Also the new idmapper uses request_key. I think there's a little > discussion about this in the archives. > Thanks, Bruce. Nice to know, that you noticed this discussion. I'll rpc_pipefs to the todo list for NFS client. --=20 Best regards, Stanislav Kinsbursky