Re: [Qemu-devel] Block layer roadmap on wiki

[Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>]

On 08/22/2011 03:48 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
> * Stefan Hajnoczi<stefanha@gmail.com>  [2011-08-22 15:32]:
>> We wouldn't rm -rf block/* because we still need qemu-nbd.  It
>> probably makes sense to keep what we have today.  I'm talking more
>> about a shift from writing our own image format to integrating
>> existing storage support.
>
> I think this is a key point.  While I do like the idea of keeping QEMU
> focused on single VM, I think we don't help ourselves by not consuming
> the hypervisor platform services and integrating/exploiting those
> features to make using QEMU easier.

Let's avoid the h-word here as it's not terribly relevant to the discussion.

Configuring block devices is fundamentally a privileged operation.  QEMU 
fundamentally is designed to be useful as an unprivileged user.

That's the trouble with something like LVM.  Only root can create LVM 
snapshots and it's an all-or-nothing security model.

If you want to get QEMU out of the snapshot business, you need a file 
system that's widely available that allows non-privileged users to take 
snapshots of individual files.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori