From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d2Bvovm4eXJS for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:01:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from archlinux.org (gerolde.archlinux.org [66.211.214.132]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:01:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [134.61.86.45] (86-045.eduroam.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.61.86.45]) by archlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3DB692032 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 06:01:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E537A8D.8020707@archlinux.org> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:01:49 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Thomas_B=E4chler?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E4AD6F2.8020800@archlinux.org> <4E4AE4DB.30205@redhat.com> <4E4AE740.9020800@archlinux.org> <4E4B6E61.4020301@redhat.com> <4E4BA46F.5010809@alexanderkoch.net> <1313577794.6534.12.camel@oban> <4E4B9C78.70504@redhat.com> <4E4BA673.9060000@redhat.com> <1313583460.6534.14.camel@oban> <4E4CD3CF.5050803@redhat.com> <4E4CE1B4.2070401@archlinux.org> <4E4CE8AB.9050106@redhat.com> <4E5242CE.2010108@archlinux.org> In-Reply-To: <4E5242CE.2010108@archlinux.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9C3C6BEBC0ADAA5076BDBE96" Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] The weird bug again: semid XXXXXX: semop failed for cookie 0xdeadbeef: incorrect semaphore state List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9C3C6BEBC0ADAA5076BDBE96 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 22.08.2011 13:51, schrieb Thomas B=E4chler: > Am 18.08.2011 12:25, schrieb Milan Broz: >> On 08/18/2011 11:56 AM, Thomas B=E4chler wrote: >>> Am 18.08.2011 10:56, schrieb Milan Broz: >>>> I will report that upstream because this is quite unexpected result,= easily >>>> reproducible with simple clone() and dmsetup. >>> >>> Can you describe the test you are doing in more detail (or give me a = few >>> shell commands or a C program to reproduce)? >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/18/112 >=20 > And nobody seems to care. Maybe some subsystem maintainer/list would be= > more responsive than just LKML? I don't know which one though. Maybe on= e > should also CC the udev people on this. NVM, I just realized there are replies to this, but the LKML link above doesn't show them. --------------enig9C3C6BEBC0ADAA5076BDBE96 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREIAAYFAk5Teo0ACgkQEda5KzHP/VDyawCdEsh3fCMSkOb57vrpPQ4UbFVv hbsAn2TGXiiSvO7rJV6RoDOQ5yMXmlsk =QUy+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9C3C6BEBC0ADAA5076BDBE96--