From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>,
Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] qt4e-demo-image: Fix bug 999
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:16:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5442DE.7060103@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6BCD0FB4-907F-4055-A405-F236F6D3D4AA@dominion.thruhere.net>
On 08/23/2011 08:10 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 23 aug. 2011, om 14:53 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Tuesday 23 August 2011 13:27:11 you wrote:
>>> I would lean toward a seperate meta-qt layer, not sure if it should be
>>> hosted in the oe-core git repo, meta-oe or a completely seperate git repo.
>>
>> Possibly we should have meta-qt for Qt applications and additional libraries
>> such as Qwt (and I'm all for moving our current Qt apps there, they don't
>> really belong in OE-core IMHO). If you're suggesting moving out Qt itself
>> though, I think Qt belongs in OE-core, certainly as much as GTK+ does.
>
> I still say that gtk+ should be in it's own layer as well :) I hope to have some time in september to come up with a proposal to rearrange oe-core and meta-oe in a more logical set of layers.
Yea, we should discuss this further (post 1.1) for me, while I think
it's important to have some demos/test with the oe-core (if we keep it
in oe-core), I am not sure we should have all the tests there.
I would suggest possibly renaming the current meta-qt3 to meta-qt and
including this set of demos there.
Comments?
Sau!
We already have a QT3 layer, maybe it makes sense to make that a generic
meta-qt layer and have things reside in it.
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-24 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-23 10:57 [PATCH 0/1] qt4e-demo-image: Fix bug 999 Xiaofeng Yan
2011-08-23 10:57 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Xiaofeng Yan
2011-08-23 12:18 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-08-23 12:27 ` Koen Kooi
2011-08-23 12:53 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-08-23 15:10 ` Koen Kooi
2011-08-24 0:16 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2011-08-24 1:04 ` Paul Eggleton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-24 6:34 [PATCH 0/1] " Xiaofeng Yan
2011-08-24 6:34 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Xiaofeng Yan
2011-08-24 23:36 ` Saul Wold
2011-08-25 0:13 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-08-25 2:10 ` Xiaofeng Yan
2011-09-05 1:47 [PATCH 0/1]:qt4e-demo-image: " Xiaofeng Yan
2011-09-05 1:47 ` [PATCH 1/1] qt4e-demo-image:Fix " Xiaofeng Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E5442DE.7060103@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.