All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Steevven1 <steevven1@gmail.com>
Cc: Anca Emanuel <anca.emanuel@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Bug Report for Linux Kernel 3.x
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:46:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E552B01.7090109@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFWT=80YV-+-COSfGnuDTSxqy17kgXCQpCVJD1b2yif_nM=1Yg@mail.gmail.com>

On 8/24/2011 9:44 AM, Steevven1 wrote:

> VERY interesting! The second link seems to imply that Phoronix has
> independently found this same bug that we've been talking about in my
> originally-linked ubuntuforums discussion. Specifically, the
> interesting quote is:
>
> "Besides the new Linux 3.1 kernel power regression, there's also a
> power regression introduced in the Linux 3.0 kernel that has
> previously not been talked about on Phoronix. The Linux 3.0 power draw
> is up by 24% over the Linux 2.6.39 kernel."


sounds like good news; a 24% regression is MUCH easier to bisect than a 
0.05% regression ;-)


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-24 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-23 23:19 Bug Report for Linux Kernel 3.x Steevven1
2011-08-24  0:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-24  0:21   ` Steevven1
2011-08-24 13:58     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-24 15:08       ` Arjan van de Ven
2011-08-24 15:52         ` Anca Emanuel
2011-08-24 16:44           ` Steevven1
2011-08-24 16:46             ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2011-08-26  6:37               ` Steevven1
2011-08-24  3:58 ` Dave Jones
2011-08-24  4:00   ` Steevven1
2011-08-24 13:25     ` Jeff Chua

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E552B01.7090109@linux.intel.com \
    --to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anca.emanuel@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steevven1@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.