From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yi0-f47.google.com ([209.85.218.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QwJbn-0007Ne-HR for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 21:59:31 +0200 Received: by yia28 with SMTP id 28so1116135yia.6 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:54:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ruqa7I007cvTSmsFV3PoMqszRVmyTSFHpD0wkWBvR6A=; b=q6ofTDANRQwkaH3WLKG19o1X83nzggpQWzoKzABjuYTc8KzJ41b8QVc5Xxw+R3SJVK 5Uw2OgwhWVDOVhendEehHt1Y/mVvRtzoTrkBF85sIStyNiELDbKRyOcCmeDedRNnCuOH d8iSYkiZaBnAQxIFY94CxVXuIL4iZtCzfsof4= Received: by 10.236.9.106 with SMTP id 70mr32753165yhs.105.1314215684546; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.23.8.121] (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r28sm7292yhm.24.2011.08.24.12.54.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E555700.1090907@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:54:40 -0700 From: Khem Raj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Devshell Usage Change X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 19:59:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/24/2011 12:49 PM, Chris Larson wrote: > Saul reminded me that I never sent a proper email to let people know about the > usability change to devshell, so only those who reviewed the commits > know about it. > > In the new implementation, a single OE_TERMINAL variable controls the behavior. > > When using 'auto', or requesting an unsupported terminal, we attempt to spawn > them in priority order until we get one that's available on this system (and > in the case of the X terminals, has DISPLAY defined). The 'none' value is is it 'none' or 'noop' ? > used when we're doing things like automated builds, and want to ensure that no > terminal is *ever* spawned, under any circumstances. > > Current available terminals (in addition to 'noop' and 'auto'): > > gnome > konsole > xterm > rxvt > screen > > Examples: > > OE_TERMINAL = "xterm" > OE_TERMINAL = "noop"