From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:52:17 +0200
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Problems with [PATCH] dlm_controld: fix plock
 dev_write no op
In-Reply-To: <24E144B8C0207547AD09C467A8259F75377B83D0@lisa.maurer-it.com>
References: <24E144B8C0207547AD09C467A8259F75377B71D8@lisa.maurer-it.com>
	<4E5604C5.1060803@redhat.com>
	<24E144B8C0207547AD09C467A8259F75377B83AF@lisa.maurer-it.com>
	<4E5608A6.2070505@redhat.com>
	<24E144B8C0207547AD09C467A8259F75377B83D0@lisa.maurer-it.com>
Message-ID: <4E560D41.9020101@redhat.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 8/25/2011 10:42 AM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>>> Are there known bugs with 131.6.1.el6 (rhel6.2 is still beta)?
>>
>> I am not sure I understand the question... kernel is kind of big and a query in
>> bugzilla.redhat.com will answer your question too :)
> 
> You suggested to use another kernel, so I thought you are aware of a specific bug related to old dlm_plock.c as used in  131.6.1.el6?

The new kernel has a plock fix that the old one does not have. Unless
you are using posix locks, it doesn?t affect you.

You need a new kernel to build the userland counterpart without workaround.

Fabio