From: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@gmail.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
dhowells@redhat.com, roland@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: fix pipe coredump when core limit is 0
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:15:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E57641A.7090909@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110825105547.GA23992@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
On 08/25/2011 11:55 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:03:35AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>
>> Drats I just noticed another problem with not being able to disable core dumps
>> for a process. The `timeout` command from coreutils now tries to propagate
>> the signal from the process it's monitoring up. But since core dumps
>> can't be disabled, abrt will attribute any crashes to `timeout` rather
>> than what it's monitoring. I'll guess we'll have to revert:
>> http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commitdiff;h=5a647a0
>>
> That suggests to me that we need another flag that user space can control to
> override this behavior. It appears we may have one too - the PR_SET_DUMPABLE
> flag in the prctl syscall. Its not POSIX compliant so you'd have to ifdef it
> into coreutils, but it exists, and sounds like exactly what you'd need in the
> above case. Looking at do_coredump, clearing the PR_SET_DUMPABLE flag with
> prctl causes __get_dumpable to return 0, which skips all the code in do_coredump
> entirely. I think thats identical behavior to having a zero core limit skip the
> dump.
This would be the first use of prctl in coreutils,
but I think this should handle things.
thanks for that!
Pádraig.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-26 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-21 22:36 [PATCH] coredump: fix pipe coredump when core limit is 0 Neil Horman
2011-08-22 13:23 ` Jovi Zhang
2011-08-22 13:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-22 15:32 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-08-22 16:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-24 10:14 ` Jovi Zhang
2011-08-24 10:17 ` Jovi Zhang
2011-08-24 11:01 ` Neil Horman
2011-08-25 10:03 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-08-25 10:55 ` Neil Horman
2011-08-26 9:15 ` Pádraig Brady [this message]
2011-08-25 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-25 18:43 ` Neil Horman
2011-08-26 14:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-26 15:39 ` Neil Horman
2011-08-26 9:09 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-08-26 14:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-11-14 5:49 ` Jovi Zhang
2012-07-07 11:35 ` Jovi Zhang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-21 11:25 bookjovi
2011-08-21 15:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-21 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E57641A.7090909@draigBrady.com \
--to=p@draigbrady.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bookjovi@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.