From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4E579A32.8040208@domain.hid>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:05:54 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4E5792CE.8080307@domain.hid>
In-Reply-To: <4E5792CE.8080307@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai 2.6.0, or -rc1?
List-Id: Xenomai life and development <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/options/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
Cc: "xenomai@xenomai.org" <xenomai@xenomai.org>

On 2011-08-26 14:34, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think it is about time we release Xenomai 2.6.0. Has anyone anything
> pending (maybe Alex)? Should we release an -rc first?

No patches ATM, but [1] is still an open bug - a bug that affects the ABI.

Jan

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.real-time.xenomai.devel/8343

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux