From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (hermes.mlbassoc.com [64.234.241.98]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E109E00777 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 08:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 999) id D9C141660615; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:52:37 -0600 (MDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C8416605F7; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:52:36 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4E57C144.2060901@mlbassoc.com> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:52:36 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110707 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Ashfield References: <4E57BC7E.7070209@mlbassoc.com> <4E57BE73.8050809@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <4E57BE73.8050809@windriver.com> Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: Strange build warning X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:52:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2011-08-26 09:40, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 11-08-26 11:32 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >> Building 'bitbake core-image-sato' from scratch: >> OE Build Configuration: >> BB_VERSION = "1.13.3" >> TARGET_ARCH = "i586" >> TARGET_OS = "linux" >> MACHINE = "qemux86" >> DISTRO = "poky" >> DISTRO_VERSION = "1.0+snapshot-20110826" >> TUNE_FEATURES = "m32 i586" >> TARGET_FPU = "" >> meta >> meta-yocto = "master:6c2b7beac3cd23ed44bd3e195c6360a0932876bf" >> >> I saw this warning: >> ======================================================= >> This BSP sets 1 invalid/obsolete kernel options. >> These config options are not offered anywhere within this kernel. >> The full list can be found in your workspace at: >> /local/pc_poky/tmp/work/atom_pc-poky-linux/linux-yocto-3.0.3+git1+5b535279e61197cb194bb2dfceb8b7a04128387c_1+ead7d8334e4c075906d029789333f43e54f6257a-r1/linux/meta/cfg/yocto/standard/common-pc/atom-pc/invalid.cfg >> >> >> >> This BSP sets 11 kernel options that are possibly non-hardware related. >> The full list can be found in your workspace at: >> /local/pc_poky/tmp/work/atom_pc-poky-linux/linux-yocto-3.0.3+git1+5b535279e61197cb194bb2dfceb8b7a04128387c_1+ead7d8334e4c075906d029789333f43e54f6257a-r1/linux/meta/cfg/yocto/standard/common-pc/atom-pc/specified_non_hdw.cfg >> >> >> >> WARNING: There were 88 hardware options requested that do not >> have a corresponding value present in the final ".config" file. >> This probably means you aren't getting the config you wanted. >> The full list can be found in your workspace at: >> /local/pc_poky/tmp/work/atom_pc-poky-linux/linux-yocto-3.0.3+git1+5b535279e61197cb194bb2dfceb8b7a04128387c_1+ead7d8334e4c075906d029789333f43e54f6257a-r1/linux/meta/cfg/yocto/standard/common-pc/atom-pc/mismatch.cfg >> >> >> ======================================================== >> along with a note that the build was pausing for a few seconds so I >> would notice the error/warning. >> >> Is this important? If not, why scare me like this? > > It was a temporary warning when I forgot to bump the internal > version in the kernel tree, to match the external recipe one. > > It's just telling you that it couldn't audit to be sure that > any configs you asked for .. made it to the final build. But > in this case, I can assure you that they did. So, is it fixed, or should I file a bug like Joshua recommended? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------