From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
To: malas <malas@tcoe.iitm.ac.in>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>,
"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ad7793 adc rcv userspace test - passed succesfully
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:02:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5CB51C.5010809@cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110829053753.M60985@tcoe.iitm.ac.in>
On 08/29/11 06:39, malas wrote:
>
> Dear Jonathan Cameron,
>
> I last reported that after creating device node and opening it, read() call was failing.
> I got to fix this.
>
> The reason was this:
> 4 functions are exported from ad7793 module to iio-ring module as ring setup ops:
> namely:
> .preenable = &ad7793_ring_preenable,
> .postenable = &iio_triggered_ring_postenable,
> .predisable = &iio_triggered_ring_predisable,
> .postdisable = &ad7793_ring_postdisable,
>
> In the iio-ring modules "iio_store_ring_enable" function is invoked from user app,which
> inturn invokes the func "ad7793_ring_preenable" and subsequently driver's postenable
> function.
>
> The "iio_triggered_ring_postenable" function then attaches the poll function to the ring
> trigger soft interrupt.
>
> Since continuous mode was set and enabled the configured GPIO interrupt for capturing
> data ready signal (in ad7793_ring_preenable) as interrupt, iio_trigger_poll() invoked on
> interrupt (from drivers data rdy interrupt handler) failed to raise soft interrupt and
> as a consequence driver's ad7793_trigger_handler() was not invoked when data ready.
>
> I patched as follows in ad7793.c:
>
> 1. Moved irq enabling from ad7793_ring_preenable to ad7793_ring_postenable
> 2. Defined ad7793_ring_setup_ops ".postenable" as ad7793_ring_postenable
> 3. In ad7793_ring_postenable, invoked &iio_triggered_ring_postenable and then enabled
> the data ready signalling GPIO interrupt.
Hmm.. That will fix the issue. Normally I'd expect to see the enable actually
happening in the trigger_set_state callback rather than there, but this device
shares the interrupt line with on of the spi signal lines so is messing with irq's
a lot more than normal so I guess that doesn't work?
>
> Then, from user app after opening the device, Poll() for rcv data presence was
> successful and read() call returned non-zero size . Could print the data from ring buffer.
>
> Sincere thanks to you and Michael for guiding me through.
>
> Take care.
>
> regards
> Mala
>
>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-30 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-24 8:26 ad7793 adc rcv userspace test - details attached malas
2011-08-24 8:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-08-24 8:53 ` malas
2011-08-24 15:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-08-25 6:58 ` malas
2011-08-29 5:39 ` ad7793 adc rcv userspace test - passed succesfully malas
2011-08-30 10:02 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E5CB51C.5010809@cam.ac.uk \
--to=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=malas@tcoe.iitm.ac.in \
--cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.