All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [xen-unstable test] 8803: regressions - FAIL
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:55:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5FD505.8020504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314894926.28989.146.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

On 09/01/11 18:35, Ian Campbell wrote:

> diff -r bb97bd46df6c -r 4309ff953500 xen/include/asm-x86/config.h
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/config.h	Thu Sep 01 16:03:21 2011 +0100
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/config.h	Thu Sep 01 17:34:41 2011 +0100
> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
>
>   #ifdef MAX_PHYS_CPUS
>   #define NR_CPUS MAX_PHYS_CPUS
> +#elif defined __i386__
> +#define NR_CPUS 128
>   #else
>   #define NR_CPUS 256
>   #endif

Ah, sorry. This special-casing / after-the-fact #error for 32-bit is 
actually there in the RHEL-5 fork, and there I bumped only the x86_64 
default (the 32-bit one is set to 32). When I looked at the upstream 
source, I noticed only a single case (set to 128), and I figured 
upstream either makes the 32/64 distinction by different means, or they 
support 128 PCPUs on 32-bit too, and 128 being >> than 32, I thought 256 
should be fine as well.

I was wrong, sorry for wasting your time.

lacos

      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-01 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-01 15:59 [xen-unstable test] 8803: regressions - FAIL xen.org
2011-09-01 16:23 ` Ian Jackson
2011-09-01 16:35   ` Ian Campbell
2011-09-01 16:54     ` Ian Jackson
2011-09-01 18:55     ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E5FD505.8020504@redhat.com \
    --to=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.