From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1B8E0071A for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:07:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2011 14:07:31 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,315,1312182000"; d="scan'208";a="47740979" Received: from unknown (HELO envy.home) ([10.255.14.97]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2011 14:07:31 -0700 Message-ID: <4E5FF413.1090205@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:07:31 -0700 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bodke, Kishore K" References: <4BD43A85686FC34D819098DB1C3999D901889D799F@orsmsx502.amr.corp.intel.com> <1314850760.10191.3.camel@elmorro> <4E5FF19D.6000409@linux.intel.com> <4BD43A85686FC34D819098DB1C3999D901889D7F2E@orsmsx502.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4BD43A85686FC34D819098DB1C3999D901889D7F2E@orsmsx502.amr.corp.intel.com> Cc: "Hart, Darren" , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 21:07:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: > Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I > do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay. > > It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate... -- Darren > > Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart > [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 > 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; > yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT > kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay > > > > On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay >>> and it fails for the do_rootfs . >>> >> >> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt >> kernel: >> >> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed >> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> using the following commits: >> >> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel >> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea >> >> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on >> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). >> > > Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for > you? > > I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see > if I can reproduce the issue. > > Thanks, > > Darren > >> Tom >> >>> >>> >>> Attached is the build log. >>> >>> >>> >>> Could you please let me know what went wrong? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Kishore. >>> >>> >> >> > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel