From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Kinzler Subject: Re: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308 Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:58:01 +0200 Message-ID: <4E64D569.5030607@hfp.de> References: <4E64A0DF.2070007@hfp.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: James Harper Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >> With GPLPV 0.11.0.308 it worked perfectly and with very good performance >> for over 9 days but then when I wanted to monitor the status, I was no >> longer able to connect via remote desktop. When examining the file >> system of the HVMs I found that somehow even the prime95 processes did stop. >> Any ideas? Could c/s 948 make any difference? Network worked perfectly >> for 9 days, so I ask myself if the count of c/s 948 is used at all? >There is some combination that I can't reproduce that seems to cause a >problem when that count isn't passed in correctly. So it is a bug, but >I'm not sure if it causes the problems you are seeing. What exactly is the problem you encountered? >I can give you a link to a build with that fix applied if you want to >test further. Thanks. I have plans to test the 0.11.0.312 version. I have a complete build system here and a kernel-mode enabled signing certificate so I can use that for my tests. Regards Andreas