From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4E65075C.4060502@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:31:08 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E63E503.8090206@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [Xenomai-help] Xenomai 2.6.0-rc1 List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Henri Roosen Cc: Xenomai help , Xenomai core On 09/05/2011 07:14 PM, Henri Roosen wrote: > Hi Gilles, > > Unfortunately I didn't find the time to test this release yet. I'm > just wondering if there is a fix for this problem in the 2.6.0 > release: https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2011-05/msg00028.html This one is fixed, a bit differently, since we fixed the ppd handling so that the ppd is valid up to the end of a process. > > We are using the auto-relax patches on top of 2.5.6 for a long time > now. We found issues with it regarding auto-relax tasks that were not > being auto-relaxed anymore. Philippe made patches for that, see > https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2011-03/msg00161.html. Philippe's patches for rt_task_send/receive/reply should have been merged too. > However, locally I reverted those two patches because these introduced > a memory leak in xnheap; I could only do rt_task_create() > rt_task_delete() for 1024 times ;-). I thought that was the discussion > of > https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2011-05/msg00028.html at that > time and I don't recall a proper fix for it was provided. But I might > have missed it... This looks related to the ppd issue as well, in which case, it should have been fixed too. It would be nice if you could test the release and tell us whether you still have these issues. -- Gilles.