From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4E662BD6.9080205@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:19:02 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E63E503.8090206@domain.hid> <4E66049D.6000105@domain.hid> <1315315628.20820.48.camel@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <1315315628.20820.48.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [Xenomai-help] Xenomai 2.6.0-rc1 List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe Gerum Cc: Xenomai core On 09/06/2011 03:27 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 13:31 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> On 09/04/2011 10:52 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The first release candidate for the 2.6.0 version may be downloaded here: >>> >>> http://download.gna.org/xenomai/testing/xenomai-2.6.0-rc1.tar.bz2 >> >> Hi, >> >> currently 2.6.0-rc1 fails to build on 2.4 kernel, with errors related to >> vfile support. Do we really want to still support 2.4 kernels? >> > > That would not be a massive loss, but removing linux 2.4 support is more > than a few hunks here and there, so this may not be the right thing to > do ATM. Besides, it would be better not to leave the few linux 2.4 users > out there without upgrade path to xenomai 2.6, since this will be the > last maintained version from the Xenomai 2.x architecture. > > That stuff does not compile likely because the Config.in bits are not up > to date, blame it on me. I'll make this build over linux 2.4 and commit > the result today. > No problem, I was not looking for someone to blame... Since you are at it, I have problems compiling the nios2 kernel too, but I am not sure I got the proper configuration file. -- Gilles.