From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Utako Kusaka <u-kusaka@wm.jp.nec.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: BUG: i_size and i_blocks corruption on ext4 with ^huge_file
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:58:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E664343.8020009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5AEF3B.8090207@wm.jp.nec.com>
On 8/28/11 8:45 PM, Utako Kusaka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In ext4 with ^huge_file, s_maxbytes is 2199023251456. But when I create a file
> size of 2199023251456 bytes, i_size and i_blocks are corrupted.
>
> If a file size of 2TB is created, i_blocks including metadata blocks will be
> over 32bit.
For what sized filesystem block? 2T/4k is 2^29...
Oh right, i_blocks is 512 units in this case. :( Argh.
> So ext4_inode_blocks_set returns EFBIG, and i_size and i_blocks
> are not updated in ext4_do_update_inode.
Seems like this could get quite tricky.
What if there is a very badly fragmented file which requires a lot of metadata?
How could we calculate s_maxbytes to stop i_blocks from overflowing 32 bits?
In ext3 we could calculate metadata blocks for a given size, but not in this case...
I suppose we could refuse to add blocks if we would overflow, but then s_maxbytes
is misleading.
-Eric
> e.g. fallocate
>
> ext4_fallocate
> ext4_map_blocks
> ext4_falloc_update_inode
> ext4_mark_inode_dirty
> ext4_do_update_inode
> ext4_inode_blocks_set <---- error
>
>
> # uname -a
> Linux mcds1 3.0.0 #2 SMP Mon Aug 8 17:58:28 JST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> # mkfs -t ext4 -O ^huge_file /dev/vg0/lv0
> # mount /dev/vg0/lv0 /mnt/mp1
> # fallocate -o 0 -l 2199023251456 /mnt/mp1/testfile
> # stat /mnt/mp1/testfile
> File: `/mnt/mp1/testfile'
> Size: 2199023251456 Blocks: 4294967688 IO Block: 4096 regular file
> Device: fd00h/64768d Inode: 12 Links: 1
> Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root)
> Access: 2011-08-09 10:20:31.008699267 +0900
> Modify: 2011-08-09 10:20:31.008699267 +0900
> Change: 2011-08-09 10:20:42.769699811 +0900
>
> # umount /mnt/mp1
> # e2fsck -ttf /dev/vg0/lv0
> e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Inode 12, i_size is 2198888873984, should be 2199023251456. Fix<y>? yes
>
> Inode 12, i_blocks is 4294705232, should be 4294967688. Fix<y>? yes
>
> :
>
> --
> Utako Kusaka
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-06 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-29 1:45 BUG: i_size and i_blocks corruption on ext4 with ^huge_file Utako Kusaka
2011-09-06 15:58 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E664343.8020009@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=u-kusaka@wm.jp.nec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.