All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH -V2] iohandler: update qemu_fd_set_handler to work with null	call back arg
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:57:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E68BBA8.9090604@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E6893F1.8070004@redhat.com>

On 09/08/2011 05:07 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 09:44 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>> I think this is a bit more complicated than is really needed. Here's
>> what I came up with which also fixes another bug where the io channel
>> could be freed twice. I stumbled across this via a very strange
>> failure scenario. Avi, it might be worth trying this patch to see if
>> it fixes your problem too.
>
> Right now, I've got more than just one problem.
>
>>
>> One thing that I found challenging debugging this, coroutines make
>> valgrind very unhappy. Is it possible that we could have a command
>> line switch to fall back to the thread based coroutines so to make
>> things more valgrind friendly?
>
> How is valgrind even aware of coroutines? Unless is doesn't implement
> makecontext correctly, it shouldn't even be aware of them.

It detects stack switching and has trouble differentiating between a 
legitimate stack switch and something more nefarious.  I believe the 
heuristic it currently uses is the distance that RSP moves.  If it moves 
more than a certain threshold, it assumes that's a stack switch.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-08 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-07 12:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH -V2] iohandler: update qemu_fd_set_handler to work with null call back arg Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-09-07 18:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-07 19:26   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-09-08 10:07   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-08 10:16     ` Kevin Wolf
2011-09-08 12:57     ` Anthony Liguori [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E68BBA8.9090604@us.ibm.com \
    --to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.