From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BgcUm88kBECQ for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 01:15:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-gx0-f170.google.com (mail-gx0-f170.google.com [209.85.161.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 01:15:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by gxk27 with SMTP id 27so4146326gxk.1 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E6E9288.90308@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:15:20 -0400 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_F=E1bregas?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dm-crypt] Verbatim's crypto NAS - News Article List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de Hi everyone, I'd like to share this article that came up about a month ago regarding Verbatim's NAS that uses LUKS: "Backdoor suspected in Verbatim's crypto NAS" http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Backdoor-suspected-in-Verbatim-s-crypto-NAS-1315921.html I'm still wondering what was Verbatim's response to this (if there has been any). I can't find anything on Google. Regards, Jorge