From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qD96ZN11CmaN for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 01:57:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 01:57:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E6E9C66.5090701@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 01:57:26 +0200 From: Milan Broz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E6E9288.90308@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E6E9288.90308@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Verbatim's crypto NAS - News Article List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_F=E1bregas?= Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de On 09/13/2011 01:15 AM, Jorge F=E1bregas wrote: > I'd like to share this article that came up about a month ago regarding > Verbatim's NAS that uses LUKS: >=20 > "Backdoor suspected in Verbatim's crypto NAS" >=20 > http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Backdoor-suspected-in-Verbatim= -s-crypto-NAS-1315921.html *shrug* Not the first time, similar (even worse) issue, different vendor, http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=3DCVE-2009-3200 Milan