From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] hw/usb-ohci: Honour endpoint maximum packet size
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:13:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E71C1B0.5070607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8O69D5e5ojdKBM+qJHLXYyzs8fhkGPu0MUnW8uBw04cg@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/15/11 10:36, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 15 September 2011 08:33, Gerd Hoffmann<kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 09/14/11 19:48, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>
>>> Honour the maximum packet size for endpoints; this applies when
>>> sending non-isochronous data and means we transfer only as
>>> much as the endpoint allows, leaving the transfer descriptor
>>> on the list for another go next time around. This allows
>>> usb-net to work when connected to an OHCI controller model.
>>
>> Hmm, I'd tend to fix it the other way around: Fix usb-net to deal with
>> transfers larger than the endpoint packet size. What do you think?
>
> Honouring maximum packet size is mandated by the OHCI spec:
> see section 4.3.1.3.2 "Packet Size" in OHCI specification 1.0a.
> Our failure to do it is just a bug in our controller model.
No. What I think is that USBPacket shouldn't be required to be an
actual USB packet, but a transfer, i.e. do the splitting of larger
transfers into smaller packets in the usb driver emulation (if needed),
not the host adapter emulation.
Maybe it is a good idea to rename USBPacket to USBTransfer to make that
clear.
> If you want to make our usb-net implementation permit and
> advertise a larger max-packet-size (and test it for
> interoperability with a pile of OSes :-)) that's a different
> thing.
Also add usb 2.0 support while being at it.
But that is another story ...
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-15 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-14 17:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] usb-ohci: fixes to allow usb-net to work Peter Maydell
2011-09-14 17:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] hw/usb-ohci: Honour endpoint maximum packet size Peter Maydell
2011-09-15 7:33 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-09-15 8:36 ` Peter Maydell
2011-09-15 9:13 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2011-09-15 10:08 ` Peter Maydell
2011-09-15 10:49 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-09-15 11:24 ` Peter Maydell
2011-09-15 11:45 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-09-14 17:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] hw/usb-ohci: Fix OHCI_TD_T1 bit position definition Peter Maydell
2011-09-15 7:34 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-10-10 16:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] usb-ohci: fixes to allow usb-net to work Peter Maydell
2011-10-11 7:10 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E71C1B0.5070607@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.