From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:03:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization In-Reply-To: <20110915125107.GK6267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1316017900-19918-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <1316017900-19918-6-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <4E71CE5D.9030900@ti.com> <20110915102915.GJ6267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4E71EF56.3050503@ti.com> <20110915125107.GK6267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <4E71F79C.6080900@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 9/15/2011 2:51 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:28:06PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: >> The HW specs is obviously counting the IRQ number at the GIC interface. >> That offset is not known outside the MPUSS. Please have a look at the >> OMAP4430 TRM p4761 (NDA vM version). > > As far as I know, I have no access to that. I've certainly never been > pointed to any documentation on OMAP4. That's easy to fix since the same information is in the public TRM (p3386 in that case). And here is the link: http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/OMAP4430_ES2.x_PUBLIC_TRM_vX.zip Do not hesitate to ask if you never further information on OMAP SoC. Regards, Benoit From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933694Ab1IONDv (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:03:51 -0400 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:33606 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933535Ab1IONDu (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:03:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4E71F79C.6080900@ti.com> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:03:24 +0200 From: "Cousson, Benoit" Organization: Texas Instruments User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King - ARM Linux CC: Rob Herring , "marc.zyngier@arm.com" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , Thomas Abraham , "jamie@jamieiles.com" , "shawn.guo@linaro.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization References: <1316017900-19918-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <1316017900-19918-6-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <4E71CE5D.9030900@ti.com> <20110915102915.GJ6267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4E71EF56.3050503@ti.com> <20110915125107.GK6267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110915125107.GK6267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/15/2011 2:51 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:28:06PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: >> The HW specs is obviously counting the IRQ number at the GIC interface. >> That offset is not known outside the MPUSS. Please have a look at the >> OMAP4430 TRM p4761 (NDA vM version). > > As far as I know, I have no access to that. I've certainly never been > pointed to any documentation on OMAP4. That's easy to fix since the same information is in the public TRM (p3386 in that case). And here is the link: http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/OMAP4430_ES2.x_PUBLIC_TRM_vX.zip Do not hesitate to ask if you never further information on OMAP SoC. Regards, Benoit From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Cousson, Benoit" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:03:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4E71F79C.6080900@ti.com> References: <1316017900-19918-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <1316017900-19918-6-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <4E71CE5D.9030900@ti.com> <20110915102915.GJ6267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4E71EF56.3050503@ti.com> <20110915125107.GK6267@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110915125107.GK6267-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Rob Herring , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 9/15/2011 2:51 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:28:06PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: >> The HW specs is obviously counting the IRQ number at the GIC interface. >> That offset is not known outside the MPUSS. Please have a look at the >> OMAP4430 TRM p4761 (NDA vM version). > > As far as I know, I have no access to that. I've certainly never been > pointed to any documentation on OMAP4. That's easy to fix since the same information is in the public TRM (p3386 in that case). And here is the link: http://focus.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/OMAP4430_ES2.x_PUBLIC_TRM_vX.zip Do not hesitate to ask if you never further information on OMAP SoC. Regards, Benoit