From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ricflomag@gmail.com>
Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ydniwqarMBHv for <dm-crypt@saout.de>;
 Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:15:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-yx0-f178.google.com (mail-yx0-f178.google.com
 [209.85.213.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:15:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by yxj19 with SMTP id 19so2656284yxj.37
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E722492.8020501@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:15:14 -0400
From: Ricflomag <ricflomag@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANGzC2y4NOZxda_jSq_szh_5PKGTzDroCHA3OBOqVDmwev9J9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANGzC2zfxuOyi4yys+aMgkbXXMG7fsz6YXaWPo6dQdgd_R4XOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1315506605.6590.0@mofo>
 <CANGzC2y=gmHQ5pxfbeFrnJaC1TkCTpDTEkY_EUbzaJ8+ojSfVw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20110915160644.GA5473@tansi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110915160644.GA5473@tansi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] openLuks failing - semaphore weird bug involved ?
List-Id: <dm-crypt.saout.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/options/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-crypt@saout.de>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=subscribe>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de


>> I have run a "badblocks -nvs
>> /dev/sdb3<https://one.ubuntu.com/dev/sdb3>",
>> it did not find any error... And after this, SMART still reports 4 pending
>> sectors.
> Meaning the pending sectors are someplae else.
>
>> Any clue about how investigating further ?
> badblocks on /dev/sdb.
>
> Arno
That would tell me where the pending sectors are, outside of the luks 
partition. But it would not help to know why the luks partition fails to 
open, would it ?