From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:36:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] at91/gpio: drop PIN_BASE In-Reply-To: <1316285923-12461-2-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> References: <1316285923-12461-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <1316285923-12461-2-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Message-ID: <4E76FF22.40001@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le 17/09/2011 20:58, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD : > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > Cc: Nicolas Ferre > --- > arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c | 54 ++-- > arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gpio.h | 454 ++++++++++++++++---------------- > 2 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 254 deletions(-) > rewrite arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/gpio.h (78%) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c > index 04beff1..e709406 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c > @@ -60,18 +60,17 @@ static int at91_gpiolib_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, > } > > static struct at91_gpio_chip gpio_chip[] = { > - AT91_GPIO_CHIP("A", 0x00 + PIN_BASE, 32), > - AT91_GPIO_CHIP("B", 0x20 + PIN_BASE, 32), > - AT91_GPIO_CHIP("C", 0x40 + PIN_BASE, 32), > - AT91_GPIO_CHIP("D", 0x60 + PIN_BASE, 32), > - AT91_GPIO_CHIP("E", 0x80 + PIN_BASE, 32), > + AT91_GPIO_CHIP("A", 0x00, 32), > + AT91_GPIO_CHIP("B", 0x20, 32), > + AT91_GPIO_CHIP("C", 0x40, 32), > + AT91_GPIO_CHIP("D", 0x60, 32), > + AT91_GPIO_CHIP("E", 0x80, 32), > }; > > static int gpio_banks; > > static inline void __iomem *pin_to_controller(unsigned pin) > { > - pin -= PIN_BASE; > pin /= 32; > if (likely(pin < gpio_banks)) > return gpio_chip[pin].regbase; > @@ -81,7 +80,6 @@ static inline void __iomem *pin_to_controller(unsigned pin) > > static inline unsigned pin_to_mask(unsigned pin) > { > - pin -= PIN_BASE; > return 1 << (pin % 32); > } > > @@ -276,8 +274,9 @@ static u32 backups[MAX_GPIO_BANKS]; > > static int gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned state) > { > - unsigned mask = pin_to_mask(d->irq); > - unsigned bank = (d->irq - PIN_BASE) / 32; > + unsigned pin = irq_to_gpio(d->irq); No, we try to remove the use of this irq_to_gpio() function. So we have to avoid re-introducing it... [..] Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre