From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <snjw23@gmail.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com, sw0312.kim@samsung.com,
riverful.kim@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] v4l2: Add the parallel bus HREF signal polarity flags
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:48:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E7701CE.6050201@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201109190105.29383.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Hi Laurent,
On 09/19/2011 01:05 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Saturday 17 September 2011 18:06:20 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>> On 09/17/2011 02:34 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>>> On 09/17/2011 12:54 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>>> On Friday 16 September 2011 19:28:42 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>>>>> HREF is a signal indicating valid data during single line
>>>>>> transmission. Add corresponding flags for this signal to the set of
>>>>>> mediabus signal polarity flags.
>>>>>
>>>>> So that's a data valid signal that gates the pixel data ? The OMAP3 ISP
>>>>> has a
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it's "horizontal window reference" signal, it's well described in
>>>> this datasheet: http://www.morninghan.com/pdf/OV2640FSL_DS_(1_3).pdf
>>>>
>>>> AFAICS there can be also its vertical counterpart - VREF.
>>>>
>>>> Many devices seem to use this terminology. However, I realize, not all,
>>>> as you're pointing out. So perhaps it's time for some naming contest
>>>> now.. :-)
>>>
>>> No objections in principle, just one question though: can these signals
>>> actually be used simultaneously with respective *SYNC signals or only as
>>> an alternative? If the latter, maybe we could reuse same names by just
>>> making them more generic?
>>
>> That's actually a good question. In my use cases only HREF is used as
>> horizontal synchronization signal, i.e. physical bus interface has this
>> signals:
>>
>> ->| PCLK
>> ->| VSYNC
>> ->| HREF
>> ->| DATA[0:7]
>> ->| FIELD
>>
>> For interlaced mode FIELD can be connected to the horizontal
>> synchronization signal. For this case there is InvPolHSYNC bit in the host
>> interface registers to indicate the polarity. There are 5 bits actually:
>>
>> InvPolPCLK
>> InvPolVSYNC (vertical sychronization)
>> InvPolHREF (horizontal synchronization)
>> InvPolHSYNC (for interlaced mode only, FIELD port = horizontal sync.
>> signal) InvPolFIELD (interlaced mode, FIELD port = FIELD signal)
>
> Shouldn't this be handled through platform data only ?
Indeed, this is how it's done now and I didn't intend to change that.
I just wanted to replace driver's private signal polarity flag definitions
with the standard ones. Do you think I should rather keep these things in
driver's public header? It's of course a way of less resistance :)
To make things complete I thought about adding the FIELD flags, i.e.
>From 9bd11f9b14dffe877f9c546e068b4b4027c9472a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:28:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] v4l2: Add the parallel bus HREF and FIELD signal polarity
flags
HREF is a signal gating valid data during single line transmission.
FIELD is an Even/Odd field selection signal, as specified in ITU-R BT.601
standard.
Add corresponding flags for these signals to the set of media bus signal
polarity flags.
Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
---
include/media/v4l2-mediabus.h | 20 +++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-mediabus.h b/include/media/v4l2-mediabus.h
index 6114007..1952d9f 100644
--- a/include/media/v4l2-mediabus.h
+++ b/include/media/v4l2-mediabus.h
@@ -23,15 +23,21 @@
#define V4L2_MBUS_MASTER (1 << 0)
#define V4L2_MBUS_SLAVE (1 << 1)
/* Which signal polarities it supports */
-/* Note: in BT.656 mode HSYNC and VSYNC are unused */
+/* Note: in BT.656 mode HSYNC, HREF, FIELD, and VSYNC are unused */
#define V4L2_MBUS_HSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH (1 << 2)
#define V4L2_MBUS_HSYNC_ACTIVE_LOW (1 << 3)
-#define V4L2_MBUS_VSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH (1 << 4)
-#define V4L2_MBUS_VSYNC_ACTIVE_LOW (1 << 5)
-#define V4L2_MBUS_PCLK_SAMPLE_RISING (1 << 6)
-#define V4L2_MBUS_PCLK_SAMPLE_FALLING (1 << 7)
-#define V4L2_MBUS_DATA_ACTIVE_HIGH (1 << 8)
-#define V4L2_MBUS_DATA_ACTIVE_LOW (1 << 9)
+/* HREF is a horizontal window reference signal gating valid pixel data */
+#define V4L2_MBUS_HREF_ACTIVE_HIGH (1 << 4)
+#define V4L2_MBUS_HREF_ACTIVE_LOW (1 << 5)
+#define V4L2_MBUS_VSYNC_ACTIVE_HIGH (1 << 6)
+#define V4L2_MBUS_VSYNC_ACTIVE_LOW (1 << 7)
+#define V4L2_MBUS_PCLK_SAMPLE_RISING (1 << 8)
+#define V4L2_MBUS_PCLK_SAMPLE_FALLING (1 << 9)
+#define V4L2_MBUS_DATA_ACTIVE_HIGH (1 << 10)
+#define V4L2_MBUS_DATA_ACTIVE_LOW (1 << 11)
+/* Field selection signal for interlaced scan mode */
+#define V4L2_MBUS_FIELD_ACTIVE_HIGH (1 << 12)
+#define V4L2_MBUS_FIELD_ACTIVE_LOW (1 << 13)
/* Serial flags */
/* How many lanes the client can use */
-- 1.7.4.1
If there is more objection to the above changes then I'll drop the patch
and stay with driver's private definitions.
Thanks,
--
Sylwester Nawrocki
Samsung Poland R&D Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-19 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-16 17:28 [PATCH 0/2] v4l: Add media bus polarity flags for HREF signal Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-09-16 17:28 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/2] v4l2: Add the parallel bus HREF signal polarity flags Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-09-17 10:54 ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-09-17 12:07 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-09-17 12:34 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-09-17 16:06 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-09-18 23:05 ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-09-19 8:48 ` Sylwester Nawrocki [this message]
2011-09-19 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] v4l: Add media bus polarity flags for FIELD signal Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-09-19 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] v4l2: Add the polarity flags for parallel camera bus " Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-09-19 16:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] s5p-fimc: Convert to use generic media bus polarity flags Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-09-19 17:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] v4l2: Add the polarity flags for parallel camera bus FIELD signal Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-09-20 23:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-09-21 13:24 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-09-21 14:51 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-09-18 23:02 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/2] v4l2: Add the parallel bus HREF signal polarity flags Laurent Pinchart
2011-09-19 8:37 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2011-09-16 17:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] s5p-fimc: Convert to use generic bus " Sylwester Nawrocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E7701CE.6050201@samsung.com \
--to=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=riverful.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=snjw23@gmail.com \
--cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.