All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] memory: Fix old portio word accesses
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:32:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E773644.8020005@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E773365.9010008@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1990 bytes --]

On 2011-09-19 14:19, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/18/2011 10:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-09-18 18:49, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> >  On 09/18/2011 07:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>   This is PIO, limited by the x86 address space to 16 bit. Will
>> add a
>> >>  >>   comment.
>> >>  >
>> >>  >   x86 PIO is not limited to 16 bits, just ISA, which memory.c knows
>> >>  >   nothing about.
>> >>
>> >>  Confused address and data, the former is limited 16, the latter
>> can be
>> >>  32 as well. But I guess only ISA models made use of the core's
>> split up
>> >>  service, and that's why QEMU limited itself accordingly.
>> >
>> >  Let's not bury such details in the core.
>>
>> It's already in the core (ioport), and would refrain from changing it in
>> this fix.
> 
> That's the bad old core we're trying to get away from.

We overcome it at the point the last portio user was converted and that
legacy is removed.

> 
>> >
>> >  I don't think this holds for pci; there the bus always generates
>> 32-bit
>> >  writes with separate byte enables for each lane.  The device need not
>> >  even be aware of a sub-word access, for reads.
>>
>> The problem is that once we "enhance" the core with such a support to
>> potentially help one use case, we need to validate all users again if
>> they depend on the old behavior. That's tricky as breakage may only show
>> up with odd guests that issue invalid but so far harmless requests.
> 
> It's opt-in.  If a device sets
> MemoryRegionOps::impl.{min,max}_access_size = 1, it will only be fed
> byte accesses (the core will take care of breaking apart larger
> writes).  If it sets MemoryRegionOps::impl.{min,max}_access_size = 4, it
> will only get long accesses (and the core will/should shift/mask or
> RMW).  Refusing illegal access sizes is done using
> MemoryRegionOps::valid.  Most of this is unimplemented unfortunately.

That makes sense (for non-old_portio users).

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-19 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-18 12:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] memory: Fix old portio word accesses Jan Kiszka
2011-09-18 12:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 " Jan Kiszka
2011-09-18 15:37   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-18 15:43     ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-18 15:45       ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-18 16:28         ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-18 16:49           ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-18 19:07             ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-19 12:19               ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-19 12:32                 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-09-19 12:42                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-19 12:55                     ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-19 13:09                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-19 13:55                       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-09-19 13:58                         ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-26 13:30   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-18 14:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH " Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E773644.8020005@web.de \
    --to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.