From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i915: Enable SDVO hotplug interrupts for
	HDMI and DVI
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:23:48 -0400
Message-ID: <4E777AA4.3030206@redhat.com>
References: <1313574741-31193-1-git-send-email-simon.farnsworth@onelan.co.uk>
	<201109191041.27317.simon.farnsworth@onelan.co.uk>
	<yun4o08bmli.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA498A0295
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <yun4o08bmli.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On 9/19/11 11:03 AM, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:41:27 +0100, Simon Farnsworth<simon.farnsworth@onelan.co.uk>  wrote:
>> Hello Keith,
>>
>> I've not seen any replies to this patch in the last month, nor can I find it in
>> your tree at http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~keithp/linux/ (I'd check kernel.org
>> as well, but it's still down).
>>
>> Is there anything I need to do to make this patch acceptable? Or is it just a
>> case of waiting for you to catch up on post-XDC madness?
>
> It needs a bit of review, which I haven't been keeping up with, I'm
> afraid. I'm trying to catch up this week, so expect to get comments back
> in a day or so.

I've not had the opportunity to test this yet, but the code certainly 
looks plausible, and not having HPD on SDVO is just lame.

Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>

- ajax