From: Greg Dietsche <greg@gregd.org>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: iwlegacy 2011-09-14
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:59:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E77C951.5010103@gregd.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E77C129.7070203@gregd.org>
On 09/19/2011 05:24 PM, Greg Dietsche wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:31:22 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:59:16AM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>>> John,
>>>
>>> Please pull iwlegacy cleanup changes done by Greg and me, intended
>>> for 3.2. These request include huge patches with file renaming and
>>> automatic code processing done by sed and indent. Work of changing
>>> iwlegacy driver into something that I could consider maintainable
>>> is not done yet, but these massive changes bring closer into that.
>>> Hopefully with having clean, maintainable code I will be able to
>>> fix some nasty, not easy reproducible bugs, we still have in the
>>> iwlegacy driver.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> d82cdad64a0127611724c61849a8487d69fb76ef:
>>>
>>> Merge branch 'master' of
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-next
>>> (2011-08-30 16:34:33 -0400)
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>> git://github.com/dietsche/linux.git
>>> wireless-next-iwlegacy-stanislaw-greg
>>
>> It looks like you pulled something other than wireless-next into this
>> tree. If you want me to pull directly, then you need to based your
>> tree (or at least the branch I'm pulling) on wireless-next
>> exclusively.
>
> Sorry for the confusing branch name! I was naming it based on which
> kernel release the code is for and not where it was branched from. Also,
> I hadn't anticipated that my git tree might end up in pull request...
>
> The branch wireless-next-iwlegacy-stanislaw-greg is based on John's
> wireless-testing tree. Looking at previous emails in this thread, we
> referred to wireless-testing as the base for the changes, so branching
> from wireless-testing was done on purpose.
>
> I briefly tried to apply the patch set to wireless-next, but it doesn't
> like Stanislaw's second patch (rename iwl to il). So some work will need
> to be done if we really need to pull into wireless-next.
>
> I'm not real familiar with the pull process... so let me know if you'd
> like me to do something.
>
>
> Greg
To make things less confusing, I created a new branch and pushed it. you
can pull from here if you'd like:
git://github.com/dietsche/linux.git
wireless-testing-2011-09-14-iwlegacy-cleanup
Greg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-19 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-14 8:59 pull request: iwlegacy 2011-09-14 Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-09-19 19:31 ` John W. Linville
2011-09-19 22:24 ` Greg Dietsche
2011-09-19 22:59 ` Greg Dietsche [this message]
2011-09-20 7:18 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E77C951.5010103@gregd.org \
--to=greg@gregd.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.