From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.151]:37545 "EHLO ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753250Ab1IUJd3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2011 05:33:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4E79B15C.7090008@cam.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:41:48 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] staging:iio: mixed bag References: <1316535073-21444-1-git-send-email-jic23@cam.ac.uk> <20110920194929.GA15472@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20110920194929.GA15472@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org On 09/20/11 20:49, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 05:10:59PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> Various updates that would normally have gone directly >> to you from Michael, Stephen and Manuel. All have >> been on linux-iio for a while. >=20 > I get the following error when building with these patches applied: >=20 > CC [M] drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-core.o > drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-core.c: In function =E2=80=98iio_chr= dev_open=E2=80=99: > drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-core.c:1069:2: error: void value not= ignored as it ought to be > drivers/staging/iio/industrialio-core.c:1070:1: warning: control reac= hes end of non-void function >=20 > Care to try this series again? Sorry about that. Stupid screw up on my part. Part of that patch bled = into the next one which I haven't yet sent you and that being completely unconnected (and= being lazy...) I didn't test these separately. Sorry for wasting your time. Will be = more rigorous in future! =46or iio list - I'll push fixed version out to the github repository s= hortly. > thanks, >=20 > greg k-h >=20