From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Ladisch Subject: Re: Using the timer Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:45:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4E7B4A1D.7010209@ladisch.de> References: <4E79ECAB.5030904@ladisch.de> <4E7B22C6.5030600@ladisch.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3465244AB for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:45:21 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Ilya Dmitrichenko Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Ilya Dmitrichenko wrote: > So you are saying that PCM slave timer can be used in some > way, but it would be clocked at the sampling rate, right? We get an interrupt at every period boundary, so the timer would run at, e.g., one 128th of the sampling rate. > Hm, so 'snd-seq-timer' is essentially hooked to the host cpu > clock (be that TSC/RTC/HPET) ? In the default setting, yes. Regards, Clemens