From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suresh Jayaraman Subject: Re: default security mechanism for 3.1 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:55:05 +0530 Message-ID: <4E7C7AA1.2060402@suse.com> References: <20110923081620.40c0aa17@tlielax.poochiereds.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jeff Layton Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110923081620.40c0aa17-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: On 09/23/2011 05:46 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > A printk warning was added to the kernel about the default security > mode changing in 3.1. As best I can tell though, that has not happened > even though the release is imminent. Are you still planning to change > that? If not, are you planning to fix the printk? > Did you mean this one? http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-cifs/msg03976.html I remember Steve posted this patch sometime ago but I'm not seeing them in the cifs development tree.. -Suresh