[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] zmx25: Fix build warning due to 'get_reset_cause' defined but not used

[Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>]

On 09/23/2011 04:16 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> When building the zmx25 target we get:
> 
> Configuring for zmx25 board...
> generic.c:108: warning: 'get_reset_cause' defined but not used
> 
> Fix this warning by defining get_reset_cause only if CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is defined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> 
> - Only define get_reset_cause when CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is defined.
> 
>  arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c
> index 1261640..91b04c1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c
> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ ulong imx_get_perclk (int clk)
>  	return lldiv (fref, div);
>  }
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO)
>  static char *get_reset_cause(void)
>  {
>  	/* read RCSR register from CCM module */
> @@ -127,6 +128,7 @@ static char *get_reset_cause(void)
>  		return "unknown reset";
>  
>  }
> +#endif
>  

I know it does not change how it works...but should be not better to
move the get_reset_cause() function where the CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is
already active ? I mean, before the print_cpuinfo() function ? This
enforces that the two functions are not disjuncted. I know this is only
a question of taste, what do you think about it ?

Stefano

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
=====================================================================