All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@genband.com>
To: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez@taghos.com.br>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: write() on pipe blocking due to in-page fragmentation?
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:03:04 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E7D0218.7020502@genband.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110923164226.211a76dc@darkmoor.lan.box>

On 09/23/2011 01:42 PM, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The simple program attached allocates a pipe, perform a number of
> writes in it in order to fill the pipe, and then reads that data to
> empty the pipe.  The argument is used to determine how much data to
> write per write iteration.
>
> Values that are power of 2 up to PIPE_BUF work without any issues.
> Other values may cause the write() call to block.

> Intuitively, it seems that pages in the pipe are getting fragmented,
> and eventually it will reach the limit of 16 pages and, if the data is
> not consumed, will cause writers to block --- even though the data
> would fit nicely otherwise.

I suggest reading "man 7 pipe" carefully, looking at the pipe capacity 
and pipe_buf sections.

I suspect that what you're seeing is that due to the atomicity 
requirements the kernel will not spread a single write over multiple 
pages, so that when writing 3 bytes at a time each page in the queue has 
a byte of free space.

Thus, you succeed in writing up to byte 65520 (out of 65536) but 
anything after that blocks.  Note that 65536-65520=16.

>
> Is this understanding correct?  If so, is it something that should be
> fixed in the Linux kernel?
>
> Or should the application ensure that data written to the pipe will be
> done carefully as to not block a writer?

 From the man page:

"Applications should not rely on a particular capacity: an application 
should be designed so that a reading process consumes data as soon as it 
is available, so that a writing process does not remain blocked."

Chris


-- 
Chris Friesen
Software Developer
GENBAND
chris.friesen@genband.com
www.genband.com

      reply	other threads:[~2011-09-23 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-23 19:42 write() on pipe blocking due to in-page fragmentation? Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez
2011-09-23 22:03 ` Chris Friesen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E7D0218.7020502@genband.com \
    --to=chris.friesen@genband.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rnsanchez@taghos.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.