From: Hans de Bruin <jmdebruin@xmsnet.nl>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: packets skipping dnat rule and someting else
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:59:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E7DE255.1070805@xmsnet.nl> (raw)
Hi,
There are things happening in my firewall I do not understand.
The firewall has three networks: internet, dmz and lan. Hosts in de dmz
and lan networks are SNATed on there way out onto the internet. In the
dmz there is a host running rtorrent which I have told it should report
the internet ip-address of the firewall to its clients. Torrent clients
on the internet are DNATed to the host in the dmz. On average there are
10 clients.
I see two types of packets running into the INPUT chain of the firewall
I am not expecting there:
A packet I think should be on its way to de rtorrent-host in the dmz.
DST contains my internet address an DPT has the port I am running
rtorrent on:
[22734.688709] CHAINv4=in_int IN=eth3 OUT=
MAC=00:30:18:a6:c0:f2:00:0e:00:00:00:01:08:00 SRC=186.207.156.227
DST=92.254.124.152 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=112 ID=27025 DF
PROTO=TCP SPT=62434 DPT=16881 WINDOW=0 RES=0x00 RST URGP=0
Wat is the above packet doing in the INPUT chain of the firewall?
A packet on its way out. The dmz host should send it to somewhere on the
internet but not directly to the firewall adress.
[25139.574051] CHAINv4=in_dmz IN=br_dmz OUT=
MAC=fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:12:08:00 SRC=10.20.0.12
DST=92.254.124.152 LEN=60 TOS=0x08 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=48601 DF
PROTO=TCP SPT=35639 DPT=16881 WINDOW=14600 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
?
Parts of my firewall script:
net_lan=10.10.0.0/16
net_dmz=10.20.0.0/16
if_int=eth3
ip_int=92.254.124.152
ip_darkstar=10.20.0.12
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i $if_int -p tcp --dport 16881 -j DNAT
--to-destination $ip_darkstar
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i $if_int -p udp --dport 16881 -j DNAT
--to-destination $ip_darkstar
iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o $if_int -s $net_lan -j SNAT --to $ip_int
iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o $if_int -s $net_dmz -j SNAT --to $ip_int
Should I add a port range to the SNAT rules?
--
Hans
next reply other threads:[~2011-09-24 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-24 13:59 Hans de Bruin [this message]
2011-09-24 15:23 ` packets skipping dnat rule and someting else "Oleg A. Arkhangelsky"
2011-09-26 21:54 ` Hans de Bruin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E7DE255.1070805@xmsnet.nl \
--to=jmdebruin@xmsnet.nl \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.