From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: dom0 kernel Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:34:47 -0700 Message-ID: <4E8368C7.70909@goop.org> References: <1317198065.13424.109.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1317198065.13424.109.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Vasiliy Tolstov List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/28/2011 01:21 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 09:11 +0100, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: >> Hello. What kernel version is the best to use for dom0 under debian? >> Now i see, that kernel 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 panic under heavy network >> load. > Can you give us a pointer to your Debian bug report on this issue > please. > >> What is the best - get kernel from official debian packages (may be in >> sid...) or compile from git and use? > Sid currently has 3.0 packages in it and experimental has 3.1-rc$late. > If you want a more recent 2.6.32.x then git is the only real option. > >> If i need 2.6.x kernel (becouse some packages not ready to run under >> 3.x) where i can find current stable xen git tree? > Jeremy's tree is https://github.com/jsgf/linux-xen Only the "xen/next-2.6.32" branch. The other branches are work-in-progress and are not necessarily stable, usable or anything else. J