From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Kinzler Subject: Re: RE: Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308 Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:10:51 +0200 Message-ID: <4E86F53B.4050100@hfp.de> References: <4E64A0DF.2070007@hfp.de> <4E64D569.5030607@hfp.de> <4E7728F9.9020208@hfp.de> <4E7B04A4.9070601@hfp.de> <4E7CF2A8.5040405@hfp.de> <4E808FE9.5050008@hfp.de> <4E858925.6090903@hfp.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: James Harper Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hello James, > Actually one other thing you could try is simply using the Windows 2003 > version of the drivers. That uses ndis5 and scsiport instead of ndis6 > and storport. If that worked we could try running with ndis5 + storport > and see if that works okay. As long as they are from the same patchlevel > it shouldn't matter if you use one compiled for windows 2008 and one for > windows 2003 (it's possible that it might matter but I can't think of > anything). After 3d:18h I stopped my tx-based test with no problems to far. My conclusion: the switch of rx-based to tx-based did not change anything. I now compiled 0.11.0.312 with scsiport and ndis5 (and patched the .inf file, deleted the [XenGplPv.NT$ARCH$.6.0] section). Test is now running. Regards Andreas