From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net tree
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:59:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E8D6DDE.9050102@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111006155810.14a6b5c199edc388bbf11437@canb.auug.org.au>
On 10/06/2011 06:58 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in
> drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c between commit
> 37a41b4affa3 ("mac80211: add ieee80211_vif param to tsf functions") from
> the net tree and commit 3956b4a2ddb0 ("staging: brcm80211: remove locking
> macro definitions") from the staging tree.
>
> I fixed it up (which essentially means I used the staging tree version
> with one small change to the brcms_ops_conf_tx prototype) and can carry
> the fixes as necessary.
Thanks, Stephen
I had to make the mac80211 conf_tx callback change for the mainline
patch as well.
Acked.
Gr. AvS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-06 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-06 4:58 linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-06 4:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-06 8:59 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-13 5:43 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-13 5:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-13 6:12 ` Greg KH
2011-10-13 9:08 ` Arend van Spriel
2011-10-06 5:04 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-06 5:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-06 5:56 ` David Miller
2011-10-06 6:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-26 3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-26 3:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-26 4:33 ` Greg KH
2011-08-26 5:35 ` Larry Finger
2011-07-22 5:42 Stephen Rothwell
2011-07-22 5:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-07-07 5:44 Stephen Rothwell
2011-07-07 13:43 ` Greg KH
2011-07-07 5:28 Stephen Rothwell
2011-07-07 5:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-07-07 13:43 ` Greg KH
2009-09-04 7:32 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-04 14:52 ` Greg KH
2009-07-29 6:52 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-29 12:44 ` Greg KH
2009-07-29 13:46 ` David Miller
2009-07-29 14:17 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E8D6DDE.9050102@broadcom.com \
--to=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eliad@wizery.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.