From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulf Hansson Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mmc: mmci: Bugfix in pio read for small packets Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:23:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4E92AB66.1030406@stericsson.com> References: <1317109568-17905-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <20111001160937.GF11710@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4E8F028C.10102@stericsson.com> <20111008091036.GF25689@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eu1sys200aog120.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.149]:33177 "EHLO eu1sys200aog120.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752897Ab1JJIYG (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 04:24:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Linus Walleij , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Lee Jones , Stefan NILSSON9 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 03:45:48PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> >> Well, the patch system says that each one depends on the previous one, >> and the first one in the series contains the PIO read thing. >> >> Do 7108/1 onwards depend on 7106/1 and 7107/1 ? > > Probably my fault, since I was helping Ulf out with the patch tracker > introduction. > > The patches should be pretty much semantically orthogonal as > far as I can tell, the only reason dependency was stated that way > was that I couldn't tell from head-parsing whether there were > syntactical dependencies. (And wanted to avoid the annoyance > of non-applying patches...) > > So if they apply, they are independent AFAICT. 7108/1 and 7109/1, have real dependencies. Otherwise there none. BR Ulf Hansson From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ulf.hansson@stericsson.com (Ulf Hansson) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:23:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] mmc: mmci: Bugfix in pio read for small packets In-Reply-To: References: <1317109568-17905-1-git-send-email-ulf.hansson@stericsson.com> <20111001160937.GF11710@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4E8F028C.10102@stericsson.com> <20111008091036.GF25689@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <4E92AB66.1030406@stericsson.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 03:45:48PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> >> Well, the patch system says that each one depends on the previous one, >> and the first one in the series contains the PIO read thing. >> >> Do 7108/1 onwards depend on 7106/1 and 7107/1 ? > > Probably my fault, since I was helping Ulf out with the patch tracker > introduction. > > The patches should be pretty much semantically orthogonal as > far as I can tell, the only reason dependency was stated that way > was that I couldn't tell from head-parsing whether there were > syntactical dependencies. (And wanted to avoid the annoyance > of non-applying patches...) > > So if they apply, they are independent AFAICT. 7108/1 and 7109/1, have real dependencies. Otherwise there none. BR Ulf Hansson