From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtprelay-h21.telenor.se ([195.54.99.196]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RDPhD-0001xc-H8 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:55:47 +0200 Received: from iph1.telenor.se (iph1.telenor.se [195.54.127.132]) by smtprelay-h21.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138DCEAC69 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:30:45 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [83.227.57.13] X-LISTENER: [smtp.bredband.net] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao0vAJF/k05T4zkNPGdsb2JhbAAMN4k8kASMZYIXAQEBATeCBQEBAQEDOEARCxgJFg8JAwIBAgExFBMIAQHBY4dDBJN3kVQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,519,1312149600"; d="scan'208";a="493960174" Received: from c-0d39e353.011-39-73746f12.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO [10.175.196.244]) ([83.227.57.13]) by iph1.telenor.se with ESMTP; 11 Oct 2011 01:30:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4E938024.2090605@telia.com> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:30:44 +0200 From: Ulf Samuelsson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4E936282.3030505@telia.com> <20111010213559.GI3125@denix.org> In-Reply-To: <20111010213559.GI3125@denix.org> Subject: Re: psyco-dist not supported on 64 bit Linux X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:55:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2011-10-10 23:35, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:24:18PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote: >> psyco-dist will not run on a 64 bit linux. >> The guys behind psyco-dist recommends the use of PyPy >> >> What is the recommendation for 64 bit linux? >> >> Just run without JIT? >> Don't run on a 64 bit linux? >> Anything else? > Yes, not supporting 64-bit hosts is one of the known limitations of psyco. > Being stuck with Python 2.6 is another limitation. > > But, latest bitbake appears to be quite fast even w/o using psyco these days. > Especially with parallel parsing on multiple cores... > OK, I will try without JIT then. -- Best Regards Ulf Samuelsson