Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for October 11th

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 10/11/2011 03:27 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> 5) Implement subsections through the wire as top-level sections (as
>> originally intended).  Keep existing subsections with (1).
>
>
> That was (3).
>

Yes, sorry.

>> btw, it's reasonable to require that backwards migration is only to a
>> fully updated stable release, so we can do 5) too, or backport 1).
>
> But given the choice of a nasty silent failure to an
> not-quite-up-to-date stable release or failing migration to a fully
> up-to-date stable release, I think it's better that we err on the side
> of caution.

We're erring on the side of no migration, it seems.

> Not being able to migrate because of a recoverable failure is
> annoying.  Having a silent failure that possible results in corruption
> is unacceptable.

What I'm trying to avoid is making choices today that close the door on
better fixes in the future.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function