From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
To: "Christopher J. PeBenito" <cpebenito@tresys.com>
Cc: SELinux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: I am working to further shrink the size of policy in Fedora 17.
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:06:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E95E528.3040201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E95E05F.9050108@tresys.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2011 02:45 PM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On 10/12/11 14:10, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 10/12/2011 01:37 PM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>>> On 10/12/11 10:15, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>> On 10/12/2011 09:40 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>>>>> On 10/07/11 14:24, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>>>> Right now, every domain that transitions to another
>>>>>> domain gets the following rule written.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dontaudit SOURCE TARGET : process { noatsecure siginh
>>>>>> rlimitinh } ;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In Fedora 17 policy right now we have 2152 rules, out of
>>>>>> Dontaudit: 9415
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sesearch --dontaudit -p noatsecure | wc -l 2152
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We could rewrite this with one rule.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dontaudit domain domain:process { noatsecure siginh
>>>>>> rlimitinh } ;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course this is more lenient then what we have now,
>>>>>> although since it is dontaudit rules, not sure it
>>>>>> matters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Comments?
>>>>
>>>>> I'm on the fence. On one hand, I hate to overspecify the
>>>>> policy, but on the other hand, these perms can only be hit
>>>>> on a domain transition. How much does this save?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2000/90000
>>>>
>>>> 2% of the size of policy.
>>
>>> Based on my test of all Refpolicy modules compiled in, the
>>> size went from 4687381 to 4667101, a 20kB difference. If
>>> someone was trying to squeeze everything out for an embedded
>>> system policy, I could see this change, but otherwise, it
>>> doesn't seem very compelling.
>>
>> That is because you have not already shrunk your policy to the
>> degree that Fedora has. F17 is down to this.
> [...]
>> Allow: 83205 Neverallow: 0 Auditallow:
>> 10 Dontaudit: 6079
>
> I don't understand. The change in Refpolicy was 1690 dontaudit
> rules. If thats a 20kB change in Refpolicy, the 2151 rule change
> in the Fedora policy would probably be ~25kB. What is the current
> size of the Fedora policy (policy.26 on disk)?
>
ls -l /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.26
- -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1993514 Oct 11 11:14
/etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.26
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk6V5SgACgkQrlYvE4MpobMPbwCgpskAh3I/i7UX2dLUCk6y6tsY
uI4An1cbF0C9rPG3M0P4dKus/Mi1zGE3
=WTYs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-12 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-07 18:24 I am working to further shrink the size of policy in Fedora 17 Daniel J Walsh
2011-10-12 13:40 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2011-10-12 14:15 ` Daniel J Walsh
2011-10-12 17:37 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2011-10-12 18:10 ` Daniel J Walsh
2011-10-12 18:45 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2011-10-12 18:50 ` Daniel J Walsh
2011-10-12 19:06 ` Daniel J Walsh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E95E528.3040201@redhat.com \
--to=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=cpebenito@tresys.com \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.