From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laszlo Ersek Subject: Re: domain pause vs. watchdog timer Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:38:44 +0200 Message-ID: <4E96F7F4.70701@redhat.com> References: <4E96EA7F.5050309@redhat.com> <4E97101A020000780005B303@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4E97101A020000780005B303@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jan Beulich Cc: Igor Mammedov , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/13/11 16:21, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 13.10.11 at 15:41, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> if a domain is paused (= not scheduled), its process that keeps >> otherwise kicking /dev/watchdog and (thusly the hypervisor) "freezes" >> too. Should pausing a domain suspend (or "inactivate") its watchdog_timers? > > I would say yes it should. And you say it doesn't? I must have missed a changeset (or a hunk?) related to pausing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742880#c1 I backported 21529 from xen-unstable to the RHEL-5 hypervisor version, and Igor tested pausing a Fedora 16 HVM guest. The domU was destroyed while it was paused. Thanks! L.