From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.symoco.de (sysmocom.de [78.46.147.233]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F16E01327 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.101] (91-64-80-26-dynip.superkabel.de [91.64.80.26]) by mail.symoco.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D62A2543634 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E97EB3E.4070402@freyther.de> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:56:46 +0200 From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Subject: kernel modules and opkg X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:56:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I am using opkg for one of my images (because I don't have enough space for zypper, and only got apt4rpm work partially). Now module loading does not work after installation. This is due opkg installing 'interceptors' for depmod and update-modules, so the modprobe mISDN_l1loop is called before the real update-modules has been called. anyone else has seen this problem? should the interception be disabled for opkg? should it intercept modprobe as well? is something like this done for RPM? #!/bin/sh if [ -n "$D" ]; then i586-poky-linux-depmod-2.6 -A -b $D -F /...System.map-2.6.39.4-yocto-standard 2.6.39.4-yocto-standard else depmod -a update-modules || true fi if [ x"$D" = "x" ]; then modprobe mISDN_l1loop || true fi